Coverage of Presidential Candidates and Press Bias in Ghana

Ebo Afful

doi:10.63772/jocmas.v3n1.2

Authors

Ebo Afful Ghana Institute of Journalism, Accra - Ghana Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63772/jocmas.v3n1.2

Keywords:

Presidential Candidates, Press Bias, Ghana

Abstract

The news media in democracies are seen as suppliers of political stories to citizens. And one of the methods by which this activity is performed is by the news gathering and dissemination role of the media. In a situation where selection and presentation of news is based on biased instead of the interest of citizens, the ethics of the profession is questioned. In effect, it is anti-democracy and development. Above all, with regard to Ghana, it amounts to a total disregard of the code of the Ghana Journalists Association. This study examines the extent to which the press was biased in its framing of the previous presidential elections. Using content analysis, the study, which is grounded in the theory of gatekeeping, found out that in 2008 and 2012 election campaigns in Ghana, the press was biased in favour of the NPP’s presidential candidate. This result also goes to dispute the trend of incumbency bonus or advantage in Ghanaian political communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Usage Statistics

Abstract Views: 8
PDF Downloads: 3

References

Abramowitz, A. I., Alexander, B., & Gunning, M. (2006). Incumbency, redistricting and the decline of competition in U.S. House elections. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 75–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00371.x

Amegatcher, A. O. (1998). The law of the press: A Ghanaian perspective. Accra: OMEGA.

Arterton, F. (1984). Campaign organisations confront the media political environment. In D. Graber (Ed.), Media power in politics (pp. 155–163). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Bennett, W. L., & Entman, R. M. (Eds.). (2001). Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613852

Benoit, W. L., Stein, K. A., & Hansen, G. J. (2005). New York Times coverage of presidential campaigns. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(2), 356–376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900508200208

Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York, NY: Free Press.

Campbell, J. E. (2002). Is the House incumbency advantage mostly a campaign finance advantage? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the New England Political Science Association, Portland, Maine.

D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2000). Media bias in presidential election: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 133–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02866.x

Deacon, D., Wring, D., Billig, M., Downey, J., Golding, P., & Davidson, S. (2005). Reporting the 2005 U.K. general election. Loughborough University.

Daily Guide. (2008, October 31). Editorial.

Evans, H. (2000). Essential English for journalists, editors and writers. London: Pamlico.

Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1970). The structure of foreign news. In J. Tunstall (Ed.), Media sociology: A reader (pp. 259–267). London: Constable.

Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/229213

GhanaWeb. (2012, June 5). Ghana’s democracy is not intact. Retrieved from https://www.ghanaweb.com

Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2008). Ghana’s Fourth Republic: Championing the African democratic renaissance? Ghana Centre for Democratic Development Briefing Paper, 8(4).

Gunter, B. (1997). Measuring bias on television. Luton: John Libbey Media.

Hart, R. P. (2000). Campaign talk: Why elections are good for us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hartley, J. (2002). Communication, cultural and media studies: The key concepts (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136379

Hiebert, R. E., Ungurait, D. F., & Bohn, T. W. (1985). Mass media IV: An introduction to modern communication. London: Longman.

Jamieson, K. H., & Waldman, P. (2003). The press effect: Politicians, journalists, and the stories that shape the political world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195152778.001.0001

Kuypers, J. A. (2002). Press bias and politics: How the media frame controversial issues. Westport, CT: Praeger. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216000976

Langer, J. (1998). Tabloid television: Popular journalism and the ‘other news’. London: Routledge.

Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics II: Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), 143–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100201

McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

McQuail, D. (2005). McQuail’s mass communication theory (5th ed.). London: Sage.

Ninsin, K. A. (1998). Elections, democracy and elite consensus. In K. A. Ninsin (Ed.), Ghana: Transition to democracy (pp. 93–110). Dakar: CODESRIA.

Palmer, J. (2000). Spinning into control: News values and source strategies. London: Leicester University Press.

Sen, A. (1999). Democracy as a universal value. Journal of Democracy, 10(3), 3–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1999.0055

Sparks, G. G. (2002). Media effects research: A basic overview. Toronto: Wadsworth.

Strömbäck, J., & Kaid, L. L. (2008). Election news coverage around the world: A comparative perspective. In J. Strömbäck & L. L. Kaid (Eds.), The handbook of election news coverage around the world (pp. 421–431). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887172

White, D. (1950). The gatekeeper: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769905002700403