Election Campaigns Framing in an Emerging Democracy: Horse race versus Issue Framing in Ghana

Ebo Afful

doi:10.63772/jocmas.v4n1.2

Authors

Ebo Afful Ghana Institute of Journalism, Accra - Ghana Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63772/jocmas.v4n1.2

Keywords:

Framing, Gatekeeping, Horse race, Issues, Election campaigns

Abstract

Political communication literature has repeatedly documented various forms of framing election campaigns across democracies, although that on Africa, including Ghana, are few. Matters of interest to such studies concern issues, horse race, coverage tone and presidential candidates' media visibility. This paper presents some ﬁndings from a qualitative content analytical study that explored political campaign coverage of elections in the Ghanaian media and implications thereof within the context of political communication. Grounded in framing and gatekeeping theories, the study speciﬁcally focused on the relationship between two broad categories – issues and horse race framing – in the 2008 and 2012 election campaign coverage in Ghana. And with data from two state-owned and two privately-owned Ghanaian newspapers, the study analyses which categories dominated the press presentation of the various election campaigns. The study demonstrates that coverage of the two elections was issue-based with peace as the most covered issue. However, the data also appears to indicate that horse race has the potential to dominate Ghana's coverage of future elections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Usage Statistics

Abstract Views: 8
PDF Downloads: 3

References

Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. (2011). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism: Theory and Criticism, 13(2), 162–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427799

Amponsah, P. N. (2012). The Daily Graphic coverage of presidential campaigns in Ghana, 1992–2004. Journal of Political Science, Government and Politics, 1(1).

Babbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2001). The practice of social research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

Bennett, W. L., & Entman, R. M. (Eds.). (2001). Mediated politics: Communication in democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York, NY: Free Press.

Berger, A. A. (1982). Media analysis techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Brighton, P., & Foy, D. (2007). News values. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216026

Callahan, K., & Schnell, F. (2001). Assessing the democratic debate: How the news media frame elite policy discourse. Political Communication, 18(2), 183–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322970

Campbell, A. (1964). The American voter: An abridgement. New York, NY: Wiley.

Capella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195090635.001.0001

Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787.

Crick, B. (2002). Democracy: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192802507.001.0001

Cushion, S. (2012). The democratic value of news: Why public service media matter. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-27239-3

de Vreese, C. (2005). The spiral of cynicism reconsidered. European Journal of Communication, 20(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105055259

de Vreese, C. H., & Semetko, H. A. (2002). Public perception of polls and support for restrictions on the publication of polls: Denmark’s 2000 Euro referendum. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(4), 367–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.4.367

Denver, D. (1990). Issues, principles or ideology? How young voters decide. Electoral Studies, 9(1), 19–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(90)90039-B

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 51–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Entman, R. M. (2010). Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news campaign 2008. Journalism, 389–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910367587

Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2011). The nightly news nightmare: Media coverage of US presidential elections, 1988–2008. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Folarin, B. (2002). Theories of mass communication. Abeokuta: Links Publications.

Graber, D. (1993). Mass media and American politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867

Hansen, A., et al. (1999). Mass communication research methods. London: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26485-8_1

Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2000). The propaganda model. Journalism Studies, 1(1), 101–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/146167000361195

Holsti, O. R. (1968). Content analysis. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). New Delhi: Amerind Publishing.

Iyengar, S., Norpoth, H., & Hahn, K. S. (2004). Consumer demand for election news: The horserace sells. The Journal of Politics, 66(1), 157–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00146.x

Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001

Jamieson, K. H. (2001). Everything you think you know about politics—and why you’re wrong. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Keane, J. (2002). Whatever happened to democracy? London: IPPR.

Key, V. O. (1961). Public opinion and American democracy. New York, NY: Knopf.

Kuypers, J. A. (2002). Press bias and politics: How the media frame controversial issues. Westport, CT: Praeger. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216000976

Lasswell, H. D. (1941). Democracy through public opinion. Menasha, WI: Banta.

Lawrence, R. G. (2000). Game-framing the issue: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication, 93–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/105846000198422

Lawrence, R. G. (2010). Researching political news framing: Established ground and new horizons. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 265–285). New York, NY: Routledge.

Lilleker, D. G. (2006). Key concepts in political communication. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212943

Manning, P. (2001). News and news sources: A critical introduction. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218082

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the press. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

McNair, B. (2003). An introduction to political communication. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203699683

McQuail, D. (2005). McQuail’s mass communication theory (5th ed.). London: Sage.

More, J. L. (1999). Elections A to Z. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.

Newton, K. (2006). May the weak force be with you: The power of the mass media in modern politics. European Journal of Political Research, 45(2), 209–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00296.x

Palmer, J. (2000). Spinning into control: News values and source strategies. London: Leicester University Press.

Patterson, T. E. (2005). Of polls, mountains: U.S. journalists and their use of election surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 716–724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi065

Petry, E., & Bastien, E. (2008). Follow the pollster: Inaccuracies in media coverage of the horse race during the 2008 Canadian election. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423913000188

Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence. (2012). Winning the media campaign 2012.

Rosengren, K. E. (Ed.). (1981). Advances in content analysis. London: Sage.

Rosenstiel, T. (2005). Political polling and the new media culture: A case of more being less. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 698–715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi062

Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Oxford: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653

Strömbäck, J. (2009). Vox populi or vox media? Opinion polls and the Swedish media, 1998–2006. Javnost – The Public, 16(3), 55–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2009.11009009

Strömbäck, J., & Kaid, L. L. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of election news coverage around the world. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887172

UNESCO. (1979). Records of the General Conference: Twentieth session, Paris, October 24–November 28, 1978.

Valentino, N. A., Beckmann, M. N., & Buhr, T. A. (2001). A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18, 347–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600152647083