Manipulative Language in Campus Politics: Deconstructing Students’ Messages on Posters in some Ghanaian Universities

Paul Herzuah

doi:10.63772/jocmas.v6n1.3

Authors

Paul Herzuah Ghana Institute of Journalism, Accra - Ghana Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9624-6459

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63772/jocmas.v6n1.3

Keywords:

Manipulative Language, Campus Politics, Students’ Messages, Ghanaian Universities

Abstract

The University Campus has often been seen as an important site for the publication of school-related political ideas of young people (Loader, Vromen, Xenor, Steel and Bungum (2015). Against the background that critical discourse analysis seeks to uncover the ideological assumptions that are hidden in the words of written text or oral speech, this study sets out to deconstruct the language of ‘welcome’ encoded in posters and banners by would-be student leaders on the campus of some universities in Ghana in order to reveal the ideological elements contained in these posters and banners. Using Critical Discourse Analysis and genre analysis as the analytical framework, the study showed a typical move pattern of engagement used by the aspiring student leaders on the posters. This involves names and images of the participants on the posters, welcome messages, advertised student-leader positions as well as provision of contacts (mobile phone and social media) to further extend the discourse. Also, the study, through critical discourse analysis, deconstructed the language of welcome used by the aspiring student-leaders by indicating how they used the language of welcome as a cover to establish their own ideological and political ambitions. These findings have implications for students who wish to vie for positions in future campus politics and by extension national politics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Usage Statistics

Abstract Views: 7
PDF Downloads: 4

References

Ademilokun, M., & Olateju, M. (2015). A multimodal discourse analysis of some visual images in the political rally discourse of 2011 electioneering campaign in South Western Nigeria. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language (IJSCL), 4(1), 1–19.

Ahiatrogah, P. D., & Koomson, A. K. (2013). Impact of perceived student leadership role on the academic performance of distant education students in Ghana. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 1(3), 26–34. https://www.tojdel.net/journals/tojdel/articles/v01i03/v01i03-04.pdf

Alberts, J. K., Nakayama, T. K., & Martin, J. N. (2007). Human communication in society. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Armstrong, E., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, meaning, context and functional communication. Aphasiology, 24(4), 480–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902775157

Besar, J. A., Jali, M. E. M., Lyndon, N., & Selvadurai, S. (2015). Managing political behaviour of university students. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s3p48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s3p48

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218

D’Angelo, L. (2010). Creating a framework for the analysis of academic posters. Language Studies Working Papers, 2, 38–50.

De Saussure, L., & Schulz, P. (2005). Manipulation and ideology in the twentieth century: Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17

Edwards, J. (2009). Language and identity: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809842

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman.

Fairclough, N., & Fairclough, I. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137888

Glynos, J., Howarth, D., Norval, A., & Speed, E. (2009). Discourse analysis: Varieties and methods (NCRM/014). ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Jayasuriya, U. (2015). Global practices and local realities: A multimodal discourse analysis on posters advertising spoken English classes in Sri Lanka. The Macrotheme Review, 4(2) SI II, 56–66.

Juffermans, K. (2012). Multimodality and audiences: Local languaging in the Gambian linguistic landscape. Sociolinguistic Studies, 6(2), 259–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v6i2.259

Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kendall, S., Tannen, D., & Schiffrin, D. (Eds.). (2001). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden: Blackwell.

Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and master’s foreign theses in English language teaching. Canadian Centre of Science and Education, 4(1), 162–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n1p162

Loader, B., Vromen, A., Xenos, M., Steel, H., & Bungum, S. (2015). Campus politics, student societies and social media. The Sociological Review, 63(4), 820–839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12220

Mcilwain, C. D. (2007). Race, pigskin and politics: A semiotic analysis of racial images in political advertising. Semiotica, 167, 167–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/SEM.2007.075

McGregor, S. L. T. (2003). Critical discourse analysis: A primer. Retrieved May, 2018, from https://www.kon.org/archives/forum/15-1/mcgregorcda.html

Munshi, S. (2014). Student politics: A game-theoretic exploration. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/WP-2014-047.pdf

Nodoushan, M. A. S., & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses discussions sessions: A structural move analysis. International Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 5(3), 111–132.

Potter, S. J. (2008). Incorporating evaluation into media campaign design. Applied Research Forum. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1860/d08fd245f75229e983746d64ed45ce4a5c5b.pdf

Rozina, G., & Karapetjana, I. (2009). The use of language in political rhetoric: Linguistic manipulation. Retrieved February 18, 2018, from http://sablon.sdu.edu.tr/dergi/sosbilder/dosyalar/19_9pdf

Sharndama, E. C., & Mohammed, I. (2013). Stylistic analysis of selected political campaign posters and slogans in Yola Metropolis of Adamawa State of Nigeria. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(3), 60–68.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic & research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? In J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11, 11–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908

van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. London: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2008). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265678850_Critical_Discourse_Analysis_History_Agenda_Theory_and_Methodology_1

Woolard, K. A. (1992). Language, ideology: Issues and approaches. International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 2(3), 235–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.3