Government Communication and the Public: An Examination of Communication Strategies Related to Ghana’s Return to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Program in 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63772/jocmas.v10n1.1Keywords:
Government, Communication, International Monetory Fund, Policy, Ghana, StrategiesAbstract
Government communication has emerged as an important aspect of political communication in efforts to generate well-informed citizens and enhance their understanding of key national policies, ideas, and decisions. Communication remains a critical instrument in the art of governance for several reasons, including galvanizing support for government decisions, shaping public perception, and ensuring accountability. The goal of this research is to examine the communication strategies employed by the government of Ghana in communicating its decision to return to the IMF as part of economic policy measures to support what was seen at the time as an ailing economy in 2022. The main goals of this study were to identify the various communication strategies employed by the government and to assess the strategies unearthed while offering recommendations. Th study is anchored by the framework of government communication, an emerging field in political communication studies. In-depth interviews were conducted with the media, communication experts, and scholars to address the objectives set forth. The following communicative problems were unearthed: inconsistency in government communication, lack of authentic and honest discourse, evasion of responsibility, use of wrong channels, and unsuitable communication officials. The study has both practical and academic usefulness, as it informs studies in the increasingly important field of government communication and the professional practice of communication by governments, particularly in emerging democracies such as Ghana.
Downloads
Usage Statistics
- Abstract Views: 81
- PDF Downloads: 13
References
Bang, H. P. (Ed.). (2003). Governance as social and political communication. Manchester University Press.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse (Vol. 270). London: routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
Fordjour, N. K. O., & Sikanku, E. (2022). Vice-presidential candidates, language frames, and functions across two continental divides: An analysis of acceptance speeches. International Journal of Communication, 16, 19.
Howlett, M. (2009) Government Communications as a Policy Tool: A Framework for Analysis. The Canadian Political Sciences Review, 6, 23-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24124/c677/2009134
Jones, B. Authenticity in Political Discourse. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 19, 489–504 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9649-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9649-6
Liu, B. F., Horsley, J. S., & Levenshus, A. B. (2010). Government and Corporate Communication Practices: Do the Differences Matter? Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(2), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909881003639528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00909881003639528
Mayhew, L. B. (1974). Administration and Governance of the University. Unpublished manuscript.
McKee, A. (2003). Textual analysis: Beginner’s guide. Sage Publications. Miller, C. (1995). In‐depth interviewing by telephone: Some practical considerations. Evaluation & Research in Education, 9(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500799509533370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500799509533370
Rice, G., & Stankova, O. (2019). Communications as a policy tool. International Monetary Fund. https://blogs.imf.org/2019/05/22/
Sanders, K., & Canel, M. J. (2013). Government communication: Cases and challenges. Bloomsbury Academic. Showkatr, N. & Parveen, H. (2017). In-depth Interview. In e-PG Pathshala. (UGC & MHRD). Sage Publications.
Sikanku, G. E. (2023). The Obama creed in retrospect: Communicative frames and representations from an Afrocentric perspective. Communication and the Public, 8(4), 324-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473231195919
van Middelaar, L. (2020). Right from the heart: The modern politician and rhetorical authenticity. Journal of Modern European History, 18(3), 269- 274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1611894420927228 (Original work published 2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1611894420927228
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Communications, Media and Society (JOCMAS)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.