Integrity and Intrigue: Ghanaian Press Performance in the 2016 Campaign

Jennifer Hasty

doi:10.63772/jocmas.v4n1.1

Authors

Jennifer Hasty University of Pennsylvania Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1374-0932

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63772/jocmas.v4n1.1

Keywords:

Integrity, Intrigue, Ghanaian Press Performance, 2016 Campaign, Politics

Abstract

How did the Ghanaian news media serve the interests of democracy during the 2016 campaign?. This paper examines the performance of two Ghanaian daily newspapers in the context of the campaign, identifying the specific and strategic forms of public discourse that constitute the 'house style' of each newspaper. I look at the structure and content of news stories, with attention to language, mood, sources, and perspectives represented. Emphasizing themes of peace and unity, Daily Graphic continued to foreground the public pronouncements of officials at formal events. Daily Guide challenged government rhetoric with contentious stories designed to undermine ruling-party legitimacy. Both newspapers tended to represent their own distinct set of perspectives and interests, giving less attention to alternatives. Both papers make important contributions to Ghana's lively public sphere. As they strive for greater balance and complexity in their news coverage, journalists may consider increased consultation with independent civil society groups carrying out analyses of socially relevant topics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Usage Statistics

Abstract Views: 12
PDF Downloads: 3

References

ACE Electoral Knowledge Network. (2013). Media and elections. Retrieved April 25, 2017, from https://eos.cartercenter.org/uploads/document_file/path/323/Media_and_Elections_2013.pdf

CDD. (2015). Final report on Ghana’s 2012 presidential and parliamentary elections. Retrieved April 25, 2017, from http://www.cddgh.org/publications/Election-Reports/Final-Report-on-Ghanas-2012-Presidential-and-Parliamentary-Elections

Hasty, J. (2005). The press and political culture in Ghana. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/3421.0

Monga, C. (1996). The anthropology of anger: Civil society and democracy in Africa. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685858032

Norris, P., & Odugbemi, S. (2009). Evaluating media performance. In Public sentinel: News media and governance reform. Washington, DC: The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8200-4

Nyamnjoh, F. (2005). Africa’s media, democracy and the politics of belonging. London: Zed Books.

Patterson, T. E. (2016). News coverage of the 2016 general election: How the press failed the voters. Retrieved April 25, 2017, from https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2884837

Walsh, K. T. (1996). Feeding the beast: The White House versus the press. New York, NY: Random House.

Zarawik, D. (2016, November 4). The biggest loser of the 2016 presidential election? The media. The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved April 25, 2017, from http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/tv/z-on-tv-blog/bs-ae-zontv-election-press-fail-20161104-story.html