Enacting Personal Identity Through Language: An Exploration of Some Profile Statuses of WhatsApp Messenger

Paul A. A Herzuah

doi:10.63772/jocmas.v5n1.5

Authors

Paul A. A Herzuah Ghana Institute of Journalism, Accra - Ghana Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9624-6459

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63772/jocmas.v5n1.5

Keywords:

Personal Identity, Language, Technology, WhatsApp Messenger

Abstract

Technology in the twenty-first century has transformed the world in multiple exciting ways facilitating the rapid flow of information, capital and services across the globe. The constant evolution of new media has spurred the growth of multimedia affordances enabling people to assemble texts that integrate language with visual, aural, gestural and spatial modes. This digital revolution has transformed language by triggering an explosion of new vocabularies, genres and styles by reshaping literacy practices (Darvin, 2016). Digitization provides the technological basis for globalization and media convergence is a bi-product of globalization. In this study, I set out to explore the linguistic elements employed on the WhatsApp statuses of individuals who use the application to communicate messages to their readers and also to establish the connection between these linguistic elements and how they portray the identity of the users. Using Hyland’s (2005) metadiscourse strategies - stance and engagement markers as the analytical framework- the study comes out with conclusions that users of WhatsApp application employ three main metadiscourse elements: self-mention, realized through first-person singular and possessive pronouns (I, my) (stance), reader pronoun (you, your, we, our) (engagement) and directive as linguistic strategies to negotiate their identity on the status . They achieve this by directly focusing the message unto themselves and indicating special relationship with others to reveal to readers their (users’) guiding principles and philosophies in life. Directives like imperatives, modal obligation and predicative adjectives were used to pull readers into the discourse as participants and instructing them to perform an action which ultimately leads them to appreciate and share in the user’s ideas, worldview, experiences and orientation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Usage Statistics

Abstract Views: 8
PDF Downloads: 4

References

Al-Saleem, B. I. T. (2011). Language and identity in social networking sites. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(19), 197–202.

Armstrong, E., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, meaning, context and functional communication. ECU Publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902775157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902775157

Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

Brick, B. (2012). The role of social networking sites for language learning in UK higher education: The views of learners and practitioners. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 35–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2012070103

Buckingham, D. (Ed.). (2008). Youth, identity and digital media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388275.001.0001

Chen, H. I. (2013). Identity practices of multilingual writers in social networking spaces. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 143–170.

Darvin, R. (2016). Language and identity in the digital age. Retrieved May 12, 2017, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303838217

Dragomir, M., & Thompson, M. (Eds.). (2014). Digital journalism: Making news, breaking news. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org

Durante, M. (2011). The online construction of personal identity through trust and privacy. Information, 2, 594–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info2040594

Geertsema, S., Heyman, C., & Van Deventer, C. (2011). Short message services (SMS) language and written language skills: Educators’ perspectives. South African Journal of Education, 31, 475–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v31n4a370

Given, L. (Ed.). (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research. California: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909

Hamelink, C. J. (1995). Trends in world communication. In World communication. London: Zed Books.

Howard, J. A. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 367–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.367

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies. London: SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

Kadir, Z. A., Idris, H., & Husain, S. S. S. (2012). Playfulness and creativity: A look at language use online in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 404–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.141

Luckmann, T., & Knoblauch, H. (1993). Language and communication in the construction of personal, ethnic and national identity. Teorija in Praksa.

McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life. New York: McMillan.

Murray, G., Gao, X., & Lamb, T. (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847693747

Norton, B. (1997). Language, identity and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 409–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587831

Ochs, E. (2005). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective: The essential readings. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758434.ch6

Owens, T. J., Robinson, D. T., & Lovin, L. S. (2010). Three faces of identity. Annual Review of Sociology. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://soc.annualreviews.org DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134725

Paliszkiewicz, J., & Sawicka, M. (2016). Impression management in social media: The example of LinkedIn. Management, 11(3), 203–212.

Rosenberg, J., & Egbert, N. (2011). Online impression management: Personality traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of self-presentation tactics on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01560.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01560.x

Sanchez-Moya, A., & Cruz-Moya, O. (2015). “Hey there! I am using WhatsApp”: A preliminary study of recurrent discursive realization in a corpus of WhatsApp statuses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212, 52–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.298

Shafie, L. A., Nagan, S., & Osman, N. (2012). Constructing identity through Facebook profiles: Online identity and visual impression management of university students in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 134–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.102

Stald, G. (2013). Mobile identity: Youth, identity, and mobile communication media. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity and digital media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Tan, K. H., & Dras, S. (2015). What’s on your mind? Self-presentation and impression management among Malaysian tertiary level students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.SOLLS Intec Proceedings. Retrieved on July 2 2017. http://www.researchgate.net/publications/290437681

Tashmin, N. (2016). Art of impression management in social media. World Scientific News, 30, 89–102.

Tetlock, P. E., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1985). Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology: A useful dichotomy? Psychological Review, 92(1), 59–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.92.1.59

Thorne, S. L., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, identities and expressive activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000257

Thurairaj, S., Hoon, E. P., Roy, S. S., & Fong, P. K. (2015). Reflections of students’ language image in social networking sites: Making or marring academic English. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(4).

Wang, J. (2016). Literature review on the impression management in corporate information disclosure. Modern Economy, 7, 725–731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2016.76076

Wang, Y. C., Moira, B., & Kraut, R. (2016). Modelling self-disclosure in social networking sites. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ’16). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820010

Yang, C. C., & Brown, B. B. (2016). Online self-presentation on Facebook and self-development during college transition. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0385-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0385-y