A Philosophical Perspective of Communication

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63772/jocmas.v9n1.6

Keywords:

Communication, Experience, Interpretation, Power, Continental Philosophy

Abstract

The study of communication suffers from two basic problems: It lacks a theoretical canon and philosophical rigor. In view of these limitations, this article explores the significance of continental philosophy for the growth of the field. Attention is given to the traditions of phenomenology, hermeneutics, and epistemology in an effort to grasp how such notions as experience, interpretation, and power explain communicative intents, acts, and processes. The paper concludes that the application of these philosophies is necessary for traversing the borders of arid positivism and technological determinism in communication and media theory, research, and practice.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Usage Statistics

  • Abstract Views: 9
  • PDF Downloads: 4

References

Althusser, L. (1977). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: New Left Books.

Badmington, N., & Thomas, J. (2008). The Routledge critical and cultural theory reader. New York: Routledge.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

Canaarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073889

Carey, J. (1989). A cultural approach to communication. In Communication as culture: Essays on media and society (pp. 13–36). Boston: Unwin Hyman.

Catt, I. E. (2014). The two sciences of communication: In philosophical context. The Review of Communication, 14(1), 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2014.986876

Coker, W. (2014). Beyond self-containment: On the politics of culture and identity in a ‘glocal’ society. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 2(1), 56–73.

Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x

Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Descartes, R. (1980). Discourse on the method and the meditations on first philosophy (D. A. Cross, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

Elliot, A. (2009). Contemporary social theory: An introduction. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930540

Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Random House.

Foucault, M. (1984). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Random House.

Gadamer, H. (1975). Truth and method. New York, NY: Continuum.

Gadamer, H. (2006). Truth and method. New York, NY: Continuum.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 22–40). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. Centre for Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham, 50–71.

Hand, S. (Ed.). (1989). The Levinas reader. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

Heidegger, M. (1977). Basic writings (D. F. Krell, Trans.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.

Husserl, E. (1970). Crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37–51). New York, NY: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.

Littlejohn, S. W. (1996). Theories of human communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1958). Phenomenology of perception. New York, NY: Routledge.

Mattelart, A. (1996). The invention of communication (S. Emanuel, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). Phenomenology of perception. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994610

Mudimbe, V. Y., & Appiah, K. A. (1993). The impact of African studies on philosophy. In R. H. Bates, V. Y. Mudimbe, & J. F. O’Barr (Eds.), Africa and the disciplines: The contributions of research in Africa to the social sciences and humanities. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. Oxford, UK: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846223

Pennycook, A. (2012). Language and mobility: Unexpected places. New York, NY: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847697653

Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Smith, S. P. (2010). Review of Edmund Husserl’s book: Crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research, 1(9), 1235–1237.

Sturken, M., & Cartwright, C. (2009). Practices of looking: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

01-12-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Philosophical Perspective of Communication. (2023). Journal of Communications, Media and Society (JOCMAS), 9(1), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.63772/jocmas.v9n1.6

Similar Articles

1-10 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.